PodcastsRank #5683
Artwork for 52 Weeks of Cloud

52 Weeks of Cloud

Noah Gift
Share:
TechnologyPodcastsEducationHow ToENunited-statesWeekly
Rating unavailable
A weekly podcast on technical topics related to cloud computing including: MLOPs, LLMs, AWS, Azure, GCP, Multi-Cloud and Kubernetes.
Top 11.4% by pitch volume (Rank #5683 of 50,000)Data updated Feb 10, 2026

Key Facts

Publishes
Weekly
Episodes
225
Founded
N/A
Category
Technology
Number of listeners
Private
Hidden on public pages

Listen to this Podcast

Pitch this podcast
Get the guest pitch kit.
Book a quick demo to unlock the outreach details you actually need before you hit send.
  • Verified contact + outreach fields
  • Exact listener estimates (not just bands)
  • Reply rate + response timing signals
10 minutes. Friendly walkthrough. No pressure.
Book a demo
Public snapshot
Audience: 8K–20K / month
Canonical: https://podpitch.com/podcasts/52-weeks-of-cloud
Cadence: Dormant
Reply rate: 20–35%

Latest Episodes

Back to top

ELO Ratings Questions

Thu Sep 18 2025

Listen

Key ArgumentThesis: Using ELO for AI agent evaluation = measuring noiseProblem: Wrong evaluators, wrong metrics, wrong assumptions Solution: Quantitative assessment frameworksThe Comparison (00:00-02:00)Chess ELO FIDE arbiters: 120hr trainingBinary outcome: win/lossTest-retest: r=0.95Cohen's κ=0.92AI Agent ELO Random users: Google engineer? CS student? 10-year-old?Undefined dimensions: accuracy? style? speed?Test-retest: r=0.31 (coin flip)Cohen's κ=0.42Cognitive Bias Cascade (02:00-03:30)Anchoring: 34% rating variance in first 3 secondsConfirmation: 78% selective attention to preferred featuresDunning-Kruger: d=1.24 effect sizeResult: Circular preferences (A>B>C>A)The Quantitative Alternative (03:30-05:00)Objective Metrics McCabe complexity ≤20Test coverage ≥80%Big O notation comparisonSelf-admitted technical debtReliability: r=0.91 vs r=0.42Effect size: d=2.18Dream Scenario vs Reality (05:00-06:00)Dream World's best engineersAnnotated metricsStandardized criteriaReality Random internet usersNo expertise verificationSubjective preferencesKey StatisticsMetricChessAI AgentsInter-rater reliabilityκ=0.92κ=0.42Test-retestr=0.95r=0.31Temporal drift±10 pts±150 ptsHurst exponent0.890.31TakeawaysStop: Using preference votes as quality metricsStart: Automated complexity analysisROI: 4.7 months to break evenCitations MentionedKapoor et al. (2025): "AI agents that matter" - κ=0.42 findingSantos et al. (2022): Technical Debt Grading validationRegan & Haworth (2011): Chess arbiter reliability κ=0.92Chapman & Johnson (2002): 34% anchoring effectQuotable Moments"You can't rate chess with basketball fans" "0.31 reliability? That's a coin flip with extra steps" "Every preference vote is a data crime" "The psychometrics are screaming" ResourcesTechnical Debt Grading (TDG) FrameworkPMAT (Pragmatic AI Labs MCP Agent Toolkit)McCabe Complexity CalculatorCohen's Kappa Calculator 🔥 Hot Course Offers:🤖 Master GenAI Engineering - Build Production AI Systems🦀 Learn Professional Rust - Industry-Grade Development📊 AWS AI & Analytics - Scale Your ML in Cloud⚡ Production GenAI on AWS - Deploy at Enterprise Scale🛠️ Rust DevOps Mastery - Automate Everything🚀 Level Up Your Career:💼 Production ML Program - Complete MLOps & Cloud Mastery🎯 Start Learning Now - Fast-Track Your ML Career🏢 Trusted by Fortune 500 TeamsLearn end-to-end ML engineering from industry veterans at PAIML.COM

More

Key ArgumentThesis: Using ELO for AI agent evaluation = measuring noiseProblem: Wrong evaluators, wrong metrics, wrong assumptions Solution: Quantitative assessment frameworksThe Comparison (00:00-02:00)Chess ELO FIDE arbiters: 120hr trainingBinary outcome: win/lossTest-retest: r=0.95Cohen's κ=0.92AI Agent ELO Random users: Google engineer? CS student? 10-year-old?Undefined dimensions: accuracy? style? speed?Test-retest: r=0.31 (coin flip)Cohen's κ=0.42Cognitive Bias Cascade (02:00-03:30)Anchoring: 34% rating variance in first 3 secondsConfirmation: 78% selective attention to preferred featuresDunning-Kruger: d=1.24 effect sizeResult: Circular preferences (A>B>C>A)The Quantitative Alternative (03:30-05:00)Objective Metrics McCabe complexity ≤20Test coverage ≥80%Big O notation comparisonSelf-admitted technical debtReliability: r=0.91 vs r=0.42Effect size: d=2.18Dream Scenario vs Reality (05:00-06:00)Dream World's best engineersAnnotated metricsStandardized criteriaReality Random internet usersNo expertise verificationSubjective preferencesKey StatisticsMetricChessAI AgentsInter-rater reliabilityκ=0.92κ=0.42Test-retestr=0.95r=0.31Temporal drift±10 pts±150 ptsHurst exponent0.890.31TakeawaysStop: Using preference votes as quality metricsStart: Automated complexity analysisROI: 4.7 months to break evenCitations MentionedKapoor et al. (2025): "AI agents that matter" - κ=0.42 findingSantos et al. (2022): Technical Debt Grading validationRegan & Haworth (2011): Chess arbiter reliability κ=0.92Chapman & Johnson (2002): 34% anchoring effectQuotable Moments"You can't rate chess with basketball fans" "0.31 reliability? That's a coin flip with extra steps" "Every preference vote is a data crime" "The psychometrics are screaming" ResourcesTechnical Debt Grading (TDG) FrameworkPMAT (Pragmatic AI Labs MCP Agent Toolkit)McCabe Complexity CalculatorCohen's Kappa Calculator 🔥 Hot Course Offers:🤖 Master GenAI Engineering - Build Production AI Systems🦀 Learn Professional Rust - Industry-Grade Development📊 AWS AI & Analytics - Scale Your ML in Cloud⚡ Production GenAI on AWS - Deploy at Enterprise Scale🛠️ Rust DevOps Mastery - Automate Everything🚀 Level Up Your Career:💼 Production ML Program - Complete MLOps & Cloud Mastery🎯 Start Learning Now - Fast-Track Your ML Career🏢 Trusted by Fortune 500 TeamsLearn end-to-end ML engineering from industry veterans at PAIML.COM

Key Metrics

Back to top
Pitches sent
44
From PodPitch users
Rank
#5683
Top 11.4% by pitch volume (Rank #5683 of 50,000)
Average rating
N/A
Ratings count may be unavailable
Reviews
N/A
Written reviews (when available)
Publish cadence
Weekly
Dormant
Episode count
225
Data updated
Feb 10, 2026
Social followers
18.4K

Public Snapshot

Back to top
Country
United States
Language
English
Language (ISO)
Release cadence
Weekly
Latest episode date
Thu Sep 18 2025

Audience & Outreach (Public)

Back to top
Audience range
8K–20K / month
Public band
Reply rate band
20–35%
Public band
Response time band
1–2 weeks
Public band
Replies received
1–5
Public band

Public ranges are rounded for privacy. Unlock the full report for exact values.

Presence & Signals

Back to top
Social followers
18.4K
Contact available
Yes
Masked on public pages
Sponsors detected
No
Guest format
Yes

Social links

No public profiles listed.

Demo to Unlock Full Outreach Intelligence

We publicly share enough context for discovery. For actionable outreach data, unlock the private blocks below.

Audience & Growth
Demo to unlock
Monthly listeners49,360
Reply rate18.2%
Avg response4.1 days
See audience size and growth. Demo to unlock.
Contact preview
n***@hidden
Get verified host contact details. Demo to unlock.
Sponsor signals
Demo to unlock
Sponsor mentionsLikely
Ad-read historyAvailable
View sponsorship signals and ad read history. Demo to unlock.
Book a demo

How To Pitch 52 Weeks of Cloud

Back to top

Want to get booked on podcasts like this?

Become the guest your future customers already trust.

PodPitch helps you find shows, draft personalized pitches, and hit send faster. We share enough public context for discovery; for actionable outreach data, unlock the private blocks.

  • Identify shows that match your audience and offer.
  • Write pitches in your voice (nothing sends without you).
  • Move from “maybe later” to booked interviews faster.
  • Unlock deeper outreach intelligence with a quick demo.

This show is Rank #5683 by pitch volume, with 44 pitches sent by PodPitch users.

Book a demoBrowse more shows10 minutes. Friendly walkthrough. No pressure.
Rating unavailable
Ratings0
Written reviewsN/A

We summarize public review counts here; full review text aggregation is not shown on PodPitch yet.

Frequently Asked Questions About 52 Weeks of Cloud

Back to top

What is 52 Weeks of Cloud about?

A weekly podcast on technical topics related to cloud computing including: MLOPs, LLMs, AWS, Azure, GCP, Multi-Cloud and Kubernetes.

How often does 52 Weeks of Cloud publish new episodes?

Weekly

How many listeners does 52 Weeks of Cloud get?

PodPitch shows a public audience band (like "8K–20K / month"). Book a demo to unlock exact audience estimates and how we calculate them.

How can I pitch 52 Weeks of Cloud?

Use PodPitch to access verified outreach details and pitch recommendations for 52 Weeks of Cloud. Start at https://podpitch.com/try/1.

Which podcasts are similar to 52 Weeks of Cloud?

This page includes internal links to similar podcasts. You can also browse the full directory at https://podpitch.com/podcasts.

How do I contact 52 Weeks of Cloud?

Public pages only show a masked contact preview. Book a demo to unlock verified email and outreach fields.

Quick favor for your future self: want podcast bookings without the extra mental load? PodPitch helps you find shows, draft personalized pitches, and hit send faster.