Why IV Starts Fail - and What Fixes It
Sun Feb 08 2026
Check out SuperNurse.ai for AI powered learning, comic-book style downloads, and super fun lessons for super nurses!
What’s Really Failing in IV Access
Over 2 billion peripheral IVs are placed globally each year
Traditional landmark-based IVs fail 33–69% of the time
Nearly 50% of catheters are removed unintentionally
Repeated failed attempts drive unnecessary central line placement
Why Escalation Isn’t FailureThe “escalation problem” occurs when failed PIV attempts lead to PICCs or central lines
Central access increases risk for:
CLABSIs
Thrombosis
Mechanical complications
Ultrasound-guided PIVs act as a rescue strategy, not a luxury
Ultrasound-Guided IVs (USGPIV): What ChangesMoves IV insertion from tactile guessing to visual confirmation
Allows assessment of:
Vessel depth
Diameter
Vein wall health
First-attempt success increases to 91–98%
The Technique That Saves the LineShort-axis (“donut view”) preferred for peripheral IVs
Master the creep method:
Advance needle → stop
Slide probe → advance needle
Repeat until lumen entry
Critical insight:
A flash means the needle is in the vein
The catheter may not be
Advance the entire device further before threading
Why Upper-Arm Veins WinBasilic and brachial veins:
Larger diameter
More stable
Less nerve density
Fewer infiltrations, longer dwell times, less patient pain
The DIVA Score: Removing Ego from AccessIdentifies difficult access before attempts begin
Risk factors include:
Obesity
Edema
Dehydration
Frequent hospitalizations
IV drug history
Score ≥3 → skip blind attempts and escalate early
Vascular Access Teams (VASTs): The ROIInefficient IV access costs $1.5 billion annually
Specialized teams save:
~$83 per patient
~$45,000 per CLABSI prevented
Faster access = better bedside nurse productivity
Midlines & Clinically Indicated ReplacementMidlines can last up to 29 days
Ideal for week-long therapies
Shift away from routine 72-hour replacement
Preserve vessels, supplies, and patient comfort
Near-Infrared Vein VisualizationHelps visualize superficial veins
Improves equity across skin tones
Best used as an assessment tool, not placement replacement
🎯 Key Takeaways for NursesBlind IV starts fail too often to be ignored
Ultrasound isn’t advanced practice — it’s evolving standard care
A flash is not the finish line
DIVA scoring protects both patients and nurses
Vascular access is about vein preservation, not just “getting a line”
Need to reach out? Send an email to BrookeWallaceRN@gmail.com
More
Check out SuperNurse.ai for AI powered learning, comic-book style downloads, and super fun lessons for super nurses! What’s Really Failing in IV Access Over 2 billion peripheral IVs are placed globally each year Traditional landmark-based IVs fail 33–69% of the time Nearly 50% of catheters are removed unintentionally Repeated failed attempts drive unnecessary central line placement Why Escalation Isn’t FailureThe “escalation problem” occurs when failed PIV attempts lead to PICCs or central lines Central access increases risk for: CLABSIs Thrombosis Mechanical complications Ultrasound-guided PIVs act as a rescue strategy, not a luxury Ultrasound-Guided IVs (USGPIV): What ChangesMoves IV insertion from tactile guessing to visual confirmation Allows assessment of: Vessel depth Diameter Vein wall health First-attempt success increases to 91–98% The Technique That Saves the LineShort-axis (“donut view”) preferred for peripheral IVs Master the creep method: Advance needle → stop Slide probe → advance needle Repeat until lumen entry Critical insight: A flash means the needle is in the vein The catheter may not be Advance the entire device further before threading Why Upper-Arm Veins WinBasilic and brachial veins: Larger diameter More stable Less nerve density Fewer infiltrations, longer dwell times, less patient pain The DIVA Score: Removing Ego from AccessIdentifies difficult access before attempts begin Risk factors include: Obesity Edema Dehydration Frequent hospitalizations IV drug history Score ≥3 → skip blind attempts and escalate early Vascular Access Teams (VASTs): The ROIInefficient IV access costs $1.5 billion annually Specialized teams save: ~$83 per patient ~$45,000 per CLABSI prevented Faster access = better bedside nurse productivity Midlines & Clinically Indicated ReplacementMidlines can last up to 29 days Ideal for week-long therapies Shift away from routine 72-hour replacement Preserve vessels, supplies, and patient comfort Near-Infrared Vein VisualizationHelps visualize superficial veins Improves equity across skin tones Best used as an assessment tool, not placement replacement 🎯 Key Takeaways for NursesBlind IV starts fail too often to be ignored Ultrasound isn’t advanced practice — it’s evolving standard care A flash is not the finish line DIVA scoring protects both patients and nurses Vascular access is about vein preservation, not just “getting a line” Need to reach out? Send an email to BrookeWallaceRN@gmail.com