PodcastsRank #33566
Artwork for Increments
PhilosophyPodcastsSociety & CultureScienceEN-UScanada
5 / 5
Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com.
Top 67.1% by pitch volume (Rank #33566 of 50,000)Data updated Feb 10, 2026

Key Facts

Publishes
N/A
Episodes
98
Founded
N/A
Category
Philosophy
Number of listeners
Private
Hidden on public pages

Listen to this Podcast

Pitch this podcast
Get the guest pitch kit.
Book a quick demo to unlock the outreach details you actually need before you hit send.
  • Verified contact + outreach fields
  • Exact listener estimates (not just bands)
  • Reply rate + response timing signals
10 minutes. Friendly walkthrough. No pressure.
Book a demo
Public snapshot
Audience: Under 4K / month
Canonical: https://podpitch.com/podcasts/increments
Reply rate: Under 2%

Latest Episodes

Back to top

#97 - Did Effective Altruism Have Ulterior Motives From the Beginning?

Fri Jan 23 2026

Listen

Two years without discussing effective altruism -- did you miss it? Not as much as Vaden, surely. And probably a right bit more than Ben. Well, we're back in the game with a spicy one. Was EA a front for AI safety from the beginning? Did the leaders care not a wit for global poverty? Is Ben going to throw himself out window if Vaden keeps this up? We discuss Feedback on our introspection episode The motives of the EA founders The felicia forum Is this a conspiracy theory? EA's strategic ambiguity Bostromism, transhumanism, and AI safety EA funding The public/core divide and the funnel model Quotes new effective altruists tend to start off concerned about global poverty or animal suffering and then hear, take seriously, and often are convinced by the arguments for existential risk mitigation - Will MacAskill Existential risk isn’t the most useful public face for effective altruism – everyone inc[l]uding Eliezer Yudkowsky agrees about that - Scott Alexander, 2015 Utilitymonster: GWWC is explicitly poverty-focused but high impact careers (HIC) is not. In fact, hardcore members of GWWC are heavily interested in x-risk, and I estimate that 10-15% of its general membership is as well. I’d take them seriously as a group for promoting utilitarianism in general. I’m a GWWC leader. [Redacted]: but HIC always seems to talk about things in terms of “lives saved”, ive never heard them mentioning other things to donate to. […] Utilitymonster: That’s exactly the right thing for HIC to do. Talk about lives saved with their public face, let hardcore members hear about x-risk, and then, in the future, if some excellent x-risk opportunity arises, direct resources to x-risk. - From felicia forum. References Gleiberman's paper: https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/files/8518/61565cb6-e056-4e35-bd2e-d14d58e35231.pdf Old EA wikipedia page (web archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20170409171350/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_altruism Old CEA webpage (web archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20161219031827/https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/fundraising/ Socials Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link Become a patreon subscriber here. Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here. Click dem like buttons on youtube Let us funnel you into the core group of super secret patreon supporters. Send us an email at incrementspodcast@gmail.com

More

Two years without discussing effective altruism -- did you miss it? Not as much as Vaden, surely. And probably a right bit more than Ben. Well, we're back in the game with a spicy one. Was EA a front for AI safety from the beginning? Did the leaders care not a wit for global poverty? Is Ben going to throw himself out window if Vaden keeps this up? We discuss Feedback on our introspection episode The motives of the EA founders The felicia forum Is this a conspiracy theory? EA's strategic ambiguity Bostromism, transhumanism, and AI safety EA funding The public/core divide and the funnel model Quotes new effective altruists tend to start off concerned about global poverty or animal suffering and then hear, take seriously, and often are convinced by the arguments for existential risk mitigation - Will MacAskill Existential risk isn’t the most useful public face for effective altruism – everyone inc[l]uding Eliezer Yudkowsky agrees about that - Scott Alexander, 2015 Utilitymonster: GWWC is explicitly poverty-focused but high impact careers (HIC) is not. In fact, hardcore members of GWWC are heavily interested in x-risk, and I estimate that 10-15% of its general membership is as well. I’d take them seriously as a group for promoting utilitarianism in general. I’m a GWWC leader. [Redacted]: but HIC always seems to talk about things in terms of “lives saved”, ive never heard them mentioning other things to donate to. […] Utilitymonster: That’s exactly the right thing for HIC to do. Talk about lives saved with their public face, let hardcore members hear about x-risk, and then, in the future, if some excellent x-risk opportunity arises, direct resources to x-risk. - From felicia forum. References Gleiberman's paper: https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/files/8518/61565cb6-e056-4e35-bd2e-d14d58e35231.pdf Old EA wikipedia page (web archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20170409171350/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_altruism Old CEA webpage (web archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20161219031827/https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/fundraising/ Socials Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link Become a patreon subscriber here. Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here. Click dem like buttons on youtube Let us funnel you into the core group of super secret patreon supporters. Send us an email at incrementspodcast@gmail.com

Key Metrics

Back to top
Pitches sent
9
From PodPitch users
Rank
#33566
Top 67.1% by pitch volume (Rank #33566 of 50,000)
Average rating
5.0
Ratings count may be unavailable
Reviews
2
Written reviews (when available)
Publish cadence
N/A
Episode count
98
Data updated
Feb 10, 2026
Social followers
1.6K

Public Snapshot

Back to top
Country
Canada
Language
EN-US
Language (ISO)
Release cadence
N/A
Latest episode date
Fri Jan 23 2026

Audience & Outreach (Public)

Back to top
Audience range
Under 4K / month
Public band
Reply rate band
Under 2%
Public band
Response time band
1–2 weeks
Public band
Replies received
1–5
Public band

Public ranges are rounded for privacy. Unlock the full report for exact values.

Presence & Signals

Back to top
Social followers
1.6K
Contact available
Yes
Masked on public pages
Sponsors detected
Private
Hidden on public pages
Guest format
Private
Hidden on public pages

Social links

No public profiles listed.

Demo to Unlock Full Outreach Intelligence

We publicly share enough context for discovery. For actionable outreach data, unlock the private blocks below.

Audience & Growth
Demo to unlock
Monthly listeners49,360
Reply rate18.2%
Avg response4.1 days
See audience size and growth. Demo to unlock.
Contact preview
i***@hidden
Get verified host contact details. Demo to unlock.
Sponsor signals
Demo to unlock
Sponsor mentionsLikely
Ad-read historyAvailable
View sponsorship signals and ad read history. Demo to unlock.
Book a demo

How To Pitch Increments

Back to top

Want to get booked on podcasts like this?

Become the guest your future customers already trust.

PodPitch helps you find shows, draft personalized pitches, and hit send faster. We share enough public context for discovery; for actionable outreach data, unlock the private blocks.

  • Identify shows that match your audience and offer.
  • Write pitches in your voice (nothing sends without you).
  • Move from “maybe later” to booked interviews faster.
  • Unlock deeper outreach intelligence with a quick demo.

This show is Rank #33566 by pitch volume, with 9 pitches sent by PodPitch users.

Book a demoBrowse more shows10 minutes. Friendly walkthrough. No pressure.
5 / 5
RatingsN/A
Written reviews2

We summarize public review counts here; full review text aggregation is not shown on PodPitch yet.

Frequently Asked Questions About Increments

Back to top

What is Increments about?

Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com.

How often does Increments publish new episodes?

Increments publishes on a variable schedule.

How many listeners does Increments get?

PodPitch shows a public audience band (like "Under 4K / month"). Book a demo to unlock exact audience estimates and how we calculate them.

How can I pitch Increments?

Use PodPitch to access verified outreach details and pitch recommendations for Increments. Start at https://podpitch.com/try/1.

Which podcasts are similar to Increments?

This page includes internal links to similar podcasts. You can also browse the full directory at https://podpitch.com/podcasts.

How do I contact Increments?

Public pages only show a masked contact preview. Book a demo to unlock verified email and outreach fields.

Quick favor for your future self: want podcast bookings without the extra mental load? PodPitch helps you find shows, draft personalized pitches, and hit send faster.