PodcastsRank #12518
Artwork for The Business of Tech

The Business of Tech

Tech NewsPodcastsNewsEN-NZnew-zealandDaily or near-daily
Rating unavailable
The Business of Tech, hosted by leading tech journalist Peter Griffin and BusinessDesk Technology editor Ben Moore.  Every week they take a deep dive into emerging technology and news from the sector to help guide the important decisions all Business leaders make.Issues such as cybersecurity, retaining trust after a cyberattack, business IT needs, purchasing SaaS tools and more.New Episodes out every Thursday. Follow or subscribe to get it delivered straight to your favourite podcatcher.@petergnz@bentm_journo@businessdesk_nz
Top 25% by pitch volume (Rank #12518 of 50,000)Data updated Feb 10, 2026

Key Facts

Publishes
Daily or near-daily
Episodes
138
Founded
N/A
Category
Tech News
Number of listeners
Private
Hidden on public pages

Listen to this Podcast

Pitch this podcast
Get the guest pitch kit.
Book a quick demo to unlock the outreach details you actually need before you hit send.
  • Verified contact + outreach fields
  • Exact listener estimates (not just bands)
  • Reply rate + response timing signals
10 minutes. Friendly walkthrough. No pressure.
Book a demo
Public snapshot
Audience: Under 4K / month
Canonical: https://podpitch.com/podcasts/the-business-of-tech
Cadence: Active weekly
Reply rate: Under 2%

Latest Episodes

Back to top

MethaneSAT: Unpacking New Zealand’s $30 Million space gamble

Wed Feb 04 2026

Listen

In the latest episode of The Business of Tech, we look at the rise and fall of MethaneSAT, the $30 million national space project that was supposed to cement New Zealand as a serious spacefaring nation.  Instead, it became a case study in governance failure, misaligned incentives and lost opportunity.  Launched in March 2024 and lost in June 2025 after persistent spacecraft glitches, MethaneSAT’s methane-sniffing science payload worked but the rest of the system carrying it in space failed. Working in space is risky, and satellites do fail. But as this week’s guest on The Business of Tech, University of Auckland physics professor Richard Easther points out, New Zealand’s involvement in the international MethaneSAT project raised questions from the start.  “What happened… is that we found this opportunity and then we found reasons to do the opportunity,” he told me.  “If someone had come to us in 2018 and said, here’s $30 million, I want you to develop things that will lead to startups, things that will provide the workforce… we could have come up with a plan and it would have been much, much better than MethaneSAT.” Picking winners: "A terrible job" Easther is careful not to scapegoat individual scientists or engineers. His critique is aimed squarely at how New Zealand chooses its science priorities and partners.  “We do a terrible job of choosing science priorities in New Zealand,” Easther said.  “And the people who pushed MethaneSAT were not scientists and do not have visible track records of testing proposals for excellence and competence.”  From governance issues to the gap between what officials were told privately and what the public heard, Easther argues MethaneSAT exposed deep problems in how we govern high‑risk, high‑cost science. But this isn’t just a post‑mortem of a failed satellite. Easther draws a direct line from MethaneSAT to today’s multi‑million‑dollar bets on AI and quantum, warning that without transparent, contestable processes – of the kind used in US “decadal reviews” – New Zealand risks repeating the same mistakes at even larger scale.  The Government yesterday announced another significant science investment, committing $35 million from the Regional Infrastructure Fund to help start-up OpenStar Technologies develop a new, specialised facility for its new fusion machine. Easther says major science investments shouldn’t come at the cost of long‑term, curiosity‑driven funding, pointing to world‑leading local strengths in high‑temperature superconductors and quantum devices that were quietly underwritten by the Marsden Fund decades ago. Tune in to The Business of Tech to hear Professor Richard Easther on what MethaneSAT got wrong, and what we should learn from it. Streaming on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks to our sponsor 2degrees. Show notes An eye in the sky to detect methane emissions - RNZ Taxpayer-funded climate satellite MethaneSAT finally reveals what's behind delays - RNZ Taxpayer-funded satellite had 'deep-seated problems' from launch - RNZ MethaneSAT Report: Advancing space capability and climate science - MBIE Government pulls back from full membership of Square Kilometre Array - RNZNew Zealand pulls out of the Square Kilometre Array after benefits questioned - Physics Today   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More

In the latest episode of The Business of Tech, we look at the rise and fall of MethaneSAT, the $30 million national space project that was supposed to cement New Zealand as a serious spacefaring nation.  Instead, it became a case study in governance failure, misaligned incentives and lost opportunity.  Launched in March 2024 and lost in June 2025 after persistent spacecraft glitches, MethaneSAT’s methane-sniffing science payload worked but the rest of the system carrying it in space failed. Working in space is risky, and satellites do fail. But as this week’s guest on The Business of Tech, University of Auckland physics professor Richard Easther points out, New Zealand’s involvement in the international MethaneSAT project raised questions from the start.  “What happened… is that we found this opportunity and then we found reasons to do the opportunity,” he told me.  “If someone had come to us in 2018 and said, here’s $30 million, I want you to develop things that will lead to startups, things that will provide the workforce… we could have come up with a plan and it would have been much, much better than MethaneSAT.” Picking winners: "A terrible job" Easther is careful not to scapegoat individual scientists or engineers. His critique is aimed squarely at how New Zealand chooses its science priorities and partners.  “We do a terrible job of choosing science priorities in New Zealand,” Easther said.  “And the people who pushed MethaneSAT were not scientists and do not have visible track records of testing proposals for excellence and competence.”  From governance issues to the gap between what officials were told privately and what the public heard, Easther argues MethaneSAT exposed deep problems in how we govern high‑risk, high‑cost science. But this isn’t just a post‑mortem of a failed satellite. Easther draws a direct line from MethaneSAT to today’s multi‑million‑dollar bets on AI and quantum, warning that without transparent, contestable processes – of the kind used in US “decadal reviews” – New Zealand risks repeating the same mistakes at even larger scale.  The Government yesterday announced another significant science investment, committing $35 million from the Regional Infrastructure Fund to help start-up OpenStar Technologies develop a new, specialised facility for its new fusion machine. Easther says major science investments shouldn’t come at the cost of long‑term, curiosity‑driven funding, pointing to world‑leading local strengths in high‑temperature superconductors and quantum devices that were quietly underwritten by the Marsden Fund decades ago. Tune in to The Business of Tech to hear Professor Richard Easther on what MethaneSAT got wrong, and what we should learn from it. Streaming on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks to our sponsor 2degrees. Show notes An eye in the sky to detect methane emissions - RNZ Taxpayer-funded climate satellite MethaneSAT finally reveals what's behind delays - RNZ Taxpayer-funded satellite had 'deep-seated problems' from launch - RNZ MethaneSAT Report: Advancing space capability and climate science - MBIE Government pulls back from full membership of Square Kilometre Array - RNZNew Zealand pulls out of the Square Kilometre Array after benefits questioned - Physics Today   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Key Metrics

Back to top
Pitches sent
26
From PodPitch users
Rank
#12518
Top 25% by pitch volume (Rank #12518 of 50,000)
Average rating
N/A
Ratings count may be unavailable
Reviews
N/A
Written reviews (when available)
Publish cadence
Daily or near-daily
Active weekly
Episode count
138
Data updated
Feb 10, 2026
Social followers
3.6K

Public Snapshot

Back to top
Country
New Zealand
Language
EN-NZ
Language (ISO)
Release cadence
Daily or near-daily
Latest episode date
Wed Feb 04 2026

Audience & Outreach (Public)

Back to top
Audience range
Under 4K / month
Public band
Reply rate band
Under 2%
Public band
Response time band
Private
Hidden on public pages
Replies received
Private
Hidden on public pages

Public ranges are rounded for privacy. Unlock the full report for exact values.

Presence & Signals

Back to top
Social followers
3.6K
Contact available
Yes
Masked on public pages
Sponsors detected
Private
Hidden on public pages
Guest format
Private
Hidden on public pages

Social links

No public profiles listed.

Demo to Unlock Full Outreach Intelligence

We publicly share enough context for discovery. For actionable outreach data, unlock the private blocks below.

Audience & Growth
Demo to unlock
Monthly listeners49,360
Reply rate18.2%
Avg response4.1 days
See audience size and growth. Demo to unlock.
Contact preview
p***@hidden
Get verified host contact details. Demo to unlock.
Sponsor signals
Demo to unlock
Sponsor mentionsLikely
Ad-read historyAvailable
View sponsorship signals and ad read history. Demo to unlock.
Book a demo

How To Pitch The Business of Tech

Back to top

Want to get booked on podcasts like this?

Become the guest your future customers already trust.

PodPitch helps you find shows, draft personalized pitches, and hit send faster. We share enough public context for discovery; for actionable outreach data, unlock the private blocks.

  • Identify shows that match your audience and offer.
  • Write pitches in your voice (nothing sends without you).
  • Move from “maybe later” to booked interviews faster.
  • Unlock deeper outreach intelligence with a quick demo.

This show is Rank #12518 by pitch volume, with 26 pitches sent by PodPitch users.

Book a demoBrowse more shows10 minutes. Friendly walkthrough. No pressure.
Rating unavailable
RatingsN/A
Written reviewsN/A

We summarize public review counts here; full review text aggregation is not shown on PodPitch yet.

Frequently Asked Questions About The Business of Tech

Back to top

What is The Business of Tech about?

The Business of Tech, hosted by leading tech journalist Peter Griffin and BusinessDesk Technology editor Ben Moore.  Every week they take a deep dive into emerging technology and news from the sector to help guide the important decisions all Business leaders make.Issues such as cybersecurity, retaining trust after a cyberattack, business IT needs, purchasing SaaS tools and more.New Episodes out every Thursday. Follow or subscribe to get it delivered straight to your favourite podcatcher.@petergnz@bentm_journo@businessdesk_nz

How often does The Business of Tech publish new episodes?

Daily or near-daily

How many listeners does The Business of Tech get?

PodPitch shows a public audience band (like "Under 4K / month"). Book a demo to unlock exact audience estimates and how we calculate them.

How can I pitch The Business of Tech?

Use PodPitch to access verified outreach details and pitch recommendations for The Business of Tech. Start at https://podpitch.com/try/1.

Which podcasts are similar to The Business of Tech?

This page includes internal links to similar podcasts. You can also browse the full directory at https://podpitch.com/podcasts.

How do I contact The Business of Tech?

Public pages only show a masked contact preview. Book a demo to unlock verified email and outreach fields.

Quick favor for your future self: want podcast bookings without the extra mental load? PodPitch helps you find shows, draft personalized pitches, and hit send faster.