Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex: Live Build, Clear Winner
Fri Feb 06 2026
I sit down with Morgan Linton, Cofounder/CTO of Bold Metrics, to break down the same-day release of Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.3 Codex. We walk through exactly how to set up Opus 4.6 in Claude Code, explore the philosophical split between autonomous agent teams and interactive pair-programming, and then put both models to the test by having each one build a Polymarket competitor from scratch, live and unscripted. By the end, you'll know how to configure each model, when to reach for one over the other, and what happened when we let them race head-to-head.
Timestamps
00:00 – Intro
03:26 – Setting Up Opus 4.6 in Claude Code
05:16 – Enabling Agent Teams
08:32 – The Philosophical Divergence between Codex and Opus
11:11 – Core Feature Comparison (Context Window, Benchmarks, Agentic Behavior)
15:27 – Live Demo Setup: Polymarket Build Prompt Design
18:26 – Race Begins
21:02 – Best Model for Vibe Coders
22:12 – Codex Finishes in Under 4 Minutes
26:38 – Opus Agents Still Running, Token Usage Climbing
31:41 – Testing and Reviewing the Codex Build
40:25 – Opus Build Completes, First Look at Results
42:47 – Opus Final Build Reveal
44:22 – Side-by-Side Comparison: Opus Takes This Round
45:40 – Final Takeaways and Recommendations
Key Points
Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.3 Codex dropped within 18 minutes of each other and represent two fundamentally different engineering philosophies — autonomous agents vs. interactive collaboration.
To use Opus 4.6 properly, you must update Claude Code to version 2.1.32+, set the model in settings.json, and explicitly enable the experimental Agent Teams feature.
Opus 4.6's standout feature is multi-agent orchestration: you can spin up parallel agents for research, architecture, UX, and testing — all working simultaneously.
GPT-5.3 Codex's standout feature is mid-task steering: you can interrupt, redirect, and course-correct the model while it's actively building.
In the live head-to-head, Codex finished a Polymarket competitor in under 4 minutes; Opus took significantly longer but produced a more polished UI, richer feature set, and 96 tests vs. Codex's 10.
Agent teams multiply token usage substantially — a single Opus build can consume 150,000–250,000 tokens across all agents.
The #1 tool to find startup ideas/trends - https://www.ideabrowser.com
LCA helps Fortune 500s and fast-growing startups build their future - from Warner Music to Fortnite to Dropbox. We turn 'what if' into reality with AI, apps, and next-gen products https://latecheckout.agency/
The Vibe Marketer - Resources for people into vibe marketing/marketing with AI: https://www.thevibemarketer.com/
FIND ME ON SOCIAL
X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/gregisenberg
Instagram: https://instagram.com/gregisenberg/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gisenberg/
Morgan Linton
X/Twitter: https://x.com/morganlinton
Bold Metrics: https://boldmetrics.com
Personal Website: https://linton.ai
More
I sit down with Morgan Linton, Cofounder/CTO of Bold Metrics, to break down the same-day release of Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.3 Codex. We walk through exactly how to set up Opus 4.6 in Claude Code, explore the philosophical split between autonomous agent teams and interactive pair-programming, and then put both models to the test by having each one build a Polymarket competitor from scratch, live and unscripted. By the end, you'll know how to configure each model, when to reach for one over the other, and what happened when we let them race head-to-head. Timestamps 00:00 – Intro 03:26 – Setting Up Opus 4.6 in Claude Code 05:16 – Enabling Agent Teams 08:32 – The Philosophical Divergence between Codex and Opus 11:11 – Core Feature Comparison (Context Window, Benchmarks, Agentic Behavior) 15:27 – Live Demo Setup: Polymarket Build Prompt Design 18:26 – Race Begins 21:02 – Best Model for Vibe Coders 22:12 – Codex Finishes in Under 4 Minutes 26:38 – Opus Agents Still Running, Token Usage Climbing 31:41 – Testing and Reviewing the Codex Build 40:25 – Opus Build Completes, First Look at Results 42:47 – Opus Final Build Reveal 44:22 – Side-by-Side Comparison: Opus Takes This Round 45:40 – Final Takeaways and Recommendations Key Points Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.3 Codex dropped within 18 minutes of each other and represent two fundamentally different engineering philosophies — autonomous agents vs. interactive collaboration. To use Opus 4.6 properly, you must update Claude Code to version 2.1.32+, set the model in settings.json, and explicitly enable the experimental Agent Teams feature. Opus 4.6's standout feature is multi-agent orchestration: you can spin up parallel agents for research, architecture, UX, and testing — all working simultaneously. GPT-5.3 Codex's standout feature is mid-task steering: you can interrupt, redirect, and course-correct the model while it's actively building. In the live head-to-head, Codex finished a Polymarket competitor in under 4 minutes; Opus took significantly longer but produced a more polished UI, richer feature set, and 96 tests vs. Codex's 10. Agent teams multiply token usage substantially — a single Opus build can consume 150,000–250,000 tokens across all agents. The #1 tool to find startup ideas/trends - https://www.ideabrowser.com LCA helps Fortune 500s and fast-growing startups build their future - from Warner Music to Fortnite to Dropbox. We turn 'what if' into reality with AI, apps, and next-gen products https://latecheckout.agency/ The Vibe Marketer - Resources for people into vibe marketing/marketing with AI: https://www.thevibemarketer.com/ FIND ME ON SOCIAL X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/gregisenberg Instagram: https://instagram.com/gregisenberg/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gisenberg/ Morgan Linton X/Twitter: https://x.com/morganlinton Bold Metrics: https://boldmetrics.com Personal Website: https://linton.ai