Always Adaptive

In this video, I break down a 10 month lifting study that compared traditional strength training, plyometrics and sprint training, functional training, and a control group in trained athletes. The researchers tested squat strength, jump height, sprint speed, and change of direction to see which style of training actually improved athletic performance the most. The results weren’t even close. But as impressive as the findings were, the study also had some important flaws in how power training and functional training were designed and progressed. I walk you through the raw data, explain what the graphs really show, and break down why strength raises your performance ceiling while skill and explosiveness sit on top of that foundation. We also dive into concepts like GPP vs SPP, progressive overload, sample size issues, and why “functional” movement without meaningful load often isn’t enough to drive real adaptation. If you care about getting stronger, faster, and more athletic without falling for flashy fitness trends, this one’s for you. Ready to reset your training and nutrition with a clear, custom plan? Book your Always Adaptive Premium Program Audit Bundle here: https://calendly.com/alwaysadaptive/premium-program-audit Coaching inquiries email me at randall@alwaysadaptive.com or visit alwaysadaptive.com