7 Best HARO Alternatives in 2026
HARO is still running and still free: Featured bought it from Cision in April 2025, four months after Cision shut down Connectively, the platform with paid plans it had turned HARO into. What changed is the crowd. A Pangram case study of Featured's platforms, HARO included, works out to about 33 pitches for every journalist request, and Featured's own research says a fifth of HARO pitches are fully AI-written.
Here are the options for people who used HARO to get quoted and want better odds, free and paid, including one that works the other way round.
By the PodPitch team. Updated .
PodPitch holds the highest G2 rating of any tool on this page (5.0 of 5), so it is listed first. Every other tool was checked against its own pricing page and public reviews, and where another tool is the better fit for a specific job, we say so. How we picked.
The short version
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | How it differs from HARO |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PodPitch | Founders, consultants and small PR firms who want to pick who hears from them | Quoted on a free demo | Pitches podcasts, journalists and Substack writers first, each email written about their recent work |
| 2. Source of Sources | Experts who want the original HARO format, free, with strict moderation | Free | Up to three free query emails a day; queries from Muck Rack-verified journalists go to the top |
| 3. Qwoted | Experts and small PR firms who want the most reporter requests and will pay for instant delivery | Free (2 pitches/mo); Pro $149/mo or $99/mo billed yearly | Pitches inside the platform with read receipts; the busiest request feed in a 2025 study |
| 4. Featured | HARO users who want AI help answering requests, plus podcast and journalist search in one tool | Free; Lite $29/mo billed yearly ($39 monthly) | HARO's owner; adds AI drafting, podcast and journalist search, and sends from your inbox |
| 5. SourceBottle | Experts and small PR firms in Australia, New Zealand or the UK | Free; paid from $25 per pitch or $65/mo | Keyword-filtered call-outs with an Australian and UK skew; staff pitch for you on paid plans |
| 6. MentionMatch (formerly Help a B2B Writer) | B2B and SaaS founders and marketers who want quotes in content from writers at high-authority sites | Free (no pricing page) | B2B-only request board; requests come from content writers rather than newsroom journalists |
| 7. Muck Rack | PR teams and agencies that want a full journalist database, monitoring and reporting | Quote only (about $5,000 per seat per year to start) | A paid, proactive PR suite: database, pitching, monitoring and coverage reports |
| HARO (for reference) | Anyone who can answer reporter queries fast and pays nothing | Free | Email digest of journalist requests, owned by Featured since April 2025 |
Prices checked October 21, 2026 on each vendor's site or, for quote-only vendors, from the public sources listed at the end.
Why people look for HARO alternatives
About 33 pitches compete for every request
A Pangram case study counts 1,394,740 pitches sent to 42,392 journalist requests across Featured, HARO and Connectively between June 2025 and July 2026, roughly 33 per request. A commenter in r/PublicRelations summed it up: you hear back from the reporter within 48 hours or not at all.
AI-written pitches changed how journalists read HARO
Featured's own HARO statistics page says 21% of pitches are fully AI-written and 35% of journalists now block pitches that Pangram flags as AI. Every pitch is scanned, so a reply classified as fully AI-written never reaches a journalist who has turned blocking on.
You can only answer, never ask
HARO shows you the queries journalists posted that day and nothing else. There is no way to pitch a writer who has not asked, no contact database to pitch from, and no follow-up; your reply goes to a masked relay address.
1. PodPitch
- Best for
- Founders, consultants and small PR firms who want to pick who hears from them
- Pricing
- Quoted on a free demo call. Plans are billed every 3, 6 or 12 months (longer terms cost less) and include unlimited users. There is no free plan.
- Coverage
- 4 million podcasts, 3 million journalists and Substack writers, drawn from 1.1 billion email addresses that refresh daily. See the database.
HARO only works when a reporter asks first, and then your reply competes with dozens of others. PodPitch starts from the other end. You describe yourself or a client, and it searches 4 million podcasts, 3 million journalists and its own Substack newsletter database, scores each one for fit, and writes a pitch that mentions that host's recent episodes or that writer's recent articles, in your voice. It sends from your own Gmail or Outlook, follows up twice if there is no answer, and collects the replies in Magic Inbox.
If you want a quote and a backlink in a specific article that a journalist is writing this week, a free request feed is a fine companion, and HARO and Source of Sources cost nothing. PodPitch is for the coverage nobody posted a request for: a podcast interview, a feature, a newsletter mention. It reaches podcasts, journalists and Substack writers without waiting for anyone to ask. Pricing is quoted on a free demo call and billed every 3, 6 or 12 months.
Peter Shankman, who founded HARO in 2008, is quoted on the PodPitch homepage: "If you're not using PodPitch, you're missing out big time." He also runs Source of Sources, the free query list reviewed below.
Where PodPitch beats HARO
- You choose who hears from you. PodPitch searches 4 million podcasts, 3 million journalists and Substack writers; HARO shows you only the queries posted that day.
- Each pitch is written about that show's or writer's recent work, in your voice from your writing samples. A HARO reply competes with dozens of others on the same request.
- Pitches send from your Gmail or Outlook, with up to two automatic follow-ups. HARO pitches go to a masked relay address, and there is no follow-up.
- Replies are collected and sorted in Magic Inbox, and anyone who answers drops out of the sequence. HARO has no reply tracking.
- Booked Media logs each interview and placement with its estimated earned media value and exports to CSV. HARO has no reporting.
What you get
Describe yourself or a client and PodPitch searches podcasts, journalists and Substack newsletters, scores each one for fit, and shows each podcast's estimated monthly listeners.
Each email mentions the show's or writer's recent work and follows your writing samples, so it reads like you wrote it.
Pitches go out from your Gmail or Outlook. Standard and Pro plans also include warmed sending mailboxes on separate domains.
Up to two follow-ups per contact. Anyone who replies drops out of the sequence automatically.
Replies from hosts and writers land in Magic Inbox, sorted, so you answer everyone from one place.
Booked Media logs every interview and placement with its estimated media value, and exports to CSV for client reports.
Keyword alerts across podcast transcripts, news articles and newsletters, emailed to you.
Unlimited users and client profiles on every plan, plus Slack alerts, single sign-on and an API for your campaign data.
The proof behind those claims
“I have used PodPitch for about 75 days and in that time I have booked just under 100 podcast appearances.”
“The outreach is meaningful since it references actual episodes from each podcast it pitches to. We have literally gotten more responses and booked podcasts than we can keep up with.”
“We've booked so many more podcasts than I was ever able to secure on my own. This is the best tool I've invested in, including Cision and MuckRack!”
“The database is insane. The fact that, when it writes your email, it mentions past episodes is a huge HUGE timesaver for us.”
Pitch, booking and team counts come from PodPitch's own send records, counted on October 21, 2026 (MagicPitch LinkedIn campaigns excluded). G2 figures are from PodPitch's G2 page on the same date, where G2 displays a 5.0 rating from 8 reviews: the highest G2 rating of any PR or podcast outreach tool compared on this site.
PodPitch vs HARO
| Feature | PodPitch | HARO |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Quoted on a free demo call; billed every 3, 6 or 12 months, no monthly plan | Free; supported by newsletter sponsors, no contract |
| Who it is for | Founders, consultants and small PR firms who want to pick their targets | Anyone who can answer reporter queries fast, at no cost |
| How you get coverage | You pitch podcasts, journalists and Substack writers who have not asked | You answer journalist queries; about 33 pitches arrive per request across Featured's platforms (Pangram case study) |
| Contacts covered | 4 million podcasts, 3 million journalists, Substack writers; see the database | No database; Featured says 75,000 journalists and bloggers use HARO (vendor figure) |
| Pitch writing | AI writes each pitch from the show's or writer's recent work, in your voice; subject-line A/B tests | You write every reply yourself; Pangram scans it and journalists can block AI-flagged pitches |
| Sending and follow-ups | From your Gmail or Outlook; up to two automatic follow-ups; warmed mailboxes on Standard and Pro | You reply to a masked relay address; no follow-ups |
| Reply handling | Magic Inbox collects and sorts replies; repliers drop out of the sequence | No tracking; an r/PublicRelations commenter says you hear back within 48 hours or not at all |
| Monitoring and reporting | Booked Media logs placements with estimated media value; keyword alerts by email | None |
| Integrations | Slack alerts, SSO, an API for your campaign data | None for HARO itself; Featured's separate AI product adds Gmail, Outlook and Slack |
| Free plan | None | Free for all users |
What you gain by switching
- A target list you choose, with a fit score on each podcast, journalist and Substack writer.
- A pitch written about that person's recent work, in your voice, instead of one reply among dozens on the same request.
- Sending from your own Gmail or Outlook with up to two automatic follow-ups; HARO has no follow-up at all.
- Replies sorted in Magic Inbox and placements logged in Booked Media with estimated earned media value, exportable to CSV.
- Unlimited users and client profiles on every plan, useful for a small PR firm with several clients.
What you give up
- No request feed. PodPitch does not show you what journalists are asking for today; if a quote in a specific article is the goal, keep a request service alongside it.
- It is not free. HARO costs nothing; PodPitch is quoted on a demo call and billed every 3, 6 or 12 months, with no monthly plan and no free plan.
- A backlink is not the product. People use HARO for links; PodPitch outreach leads to interviews and mentions, and whether the host or writer links to you is up to them.
- It takes setup and oversight. There is a lot to configure at first, and lists deserve a review before automatic sending goes on, as with any outreach tool.
- PodPitch is podcast-first by history: journalist outreach arrived in early 2025 and Substack outreach in November 2025, both inside the same searches and campaigns.
How to switch from HARO
- 1Keep your HARO subscription. It is free, and answering queries that fit does not conflict with proactive outreach.
- 2Write down the topics your HARO replies covered and the outlets that quoted you. Those become your PodPitch search topics, and the replies you wrote become writing samples.
- 3Book a free demo. A rep runs a live search for your topic and shows you the shows and writers PodPitch would pitch, then quotes pricing.
- 4Connect your Gmail or Outlook, add your writing samples, and review the first batch of pitches before you turn on automatic sending.
- 5Log each interview or mention in Booked Media so you can compare what proactive outreach produces with what HARO did.
How we picked these alternatives
We checked each tool's pricing page on October 21, 2026 and read reviews on G2, Trustpilot, TrustRadius and Reddit's r/PublicRelations. For HARO's history we relied on Cision's own notices, the PR Newswire announcements of the sale to Featured, and Featured's blog. Numbers that vendors publish about themselves are labeled as vendor figures.
We weighted what a HARO user cares about: cost (most of these tools are free), how many requests you see and how fast, how crowded each request is, and whether the tool lets you reach a writer who has not posted a request. We did not weight monitoring or reporting heavily, since a HARO user rarely has either.
PodPitch is our product, which is why it is listed first. It is a different kind of tool from HARO: where a request feed is the better pick for a same-week quote, we say so, and where interviews and features are the goal, PodPitch does the reaching out.
2. Source of Sources
Visit site- Best for
- Experts who want the original HARO format, free, with strict moderation
- Pricing
- Free. The homepage says the list does not cost a dime and suggests a donation to Best Friends Animal Society or the NYC Mayor's Alliance for Animals instead. There is no paid tier and no contract.
Source of Sources is the closest thing to the HARO of 2008 to 2023. Peter Shankman, who started HARO in 2008, launched it in April 2024 as HERO while Cision was moving HARO users onto Connectively, and renamed it later that year. You get up to three emails a day of journalist queries, reply straight to the journalist, and pay nothing. Off-topic pitches get you removed, with no appeal.
Strengths
- Queries from Muck Rack-verified journalists are prioritized at the top of each issue, with Muck Rack profiles embedded (partnership since May 2024)
- Strict moderation: off-topic pitches get the sender removed, which keeps the feed cleaner
- A TrustRadius reviewer wrote that it "captures everything that was great about HARO"
Weaknesses
- Plain email only: no keyword filters, no journalist search and no analytics
- Reactive only, with no contact data, sending or tracking; anonymous queries hide the journalist's details
- One person moderates it, and removal is at the founder's discretion with no appeal
- Query volume is not published; the site says 20,000+ journalists, broadcasters, bloggers and brands use it
Choose Source of Sources if you want the HARO of old, free, and you can answer queries fast enough to beat the crowd.
3. Qwoted
Visit site- Best for
- Experts and small PR firms who want the most reporter requests and will pay for instant delivery
- Pricing
- Basic is free with 2 pitches a month and a 2 hour delivery delay. Pro is $149 a month, or $1,188 a year ($99 a month) billed yearly, for 35 pitches a month with instant delivery. Teams is quote only. Fees are final and non-refundable under the terms of service.
Qwoted is a two-sided marketplace: journalists post calls for experts, and you pitch inside the platform rather than by email. A BuzzStream and PressPulse study of May and June 2025 data found Qwoted had by far the most queries of the seven platforms it tracked, and 70.3% of its requests came from high-authority sites. The catch is the free tier: two pitches a month, with a 2 hour delivery delay that paid users do not have. More on our Qwoted alternatives page.
Strengths
- The most requests of any platform in the 2025 BuzzStream and PressPulse study
- Read receipts show when a reporter opens your pitch or views your profile
- G2 rates it 4.4 of 5 from 23 reviews; reviewers like the real reporters and fast matching
Weaknesses
- G2 reviewers call the pricing steep for a small business
- Trustpilot 3.3 of 5 from 121 reviews; several reviewers report accounts disabled without a clear reason, one two days after buying Pro
- AI-written commentary is banned under a three strike rule, and reviewers dispute Pangram false positives
- You cannot contact reporters outside Qwoted; it is reactive only
Choose Qwoted if you want the largest flow of reporter requests and $99 to $149 a month is fine for 35 pitches.
4. Featured
Visit site- Best for
- HARO users who want AI help answering requests, plus podcast and journalist search in one tool
- Pricing
- Free plan, no card. Lite is $29 a month billed yearly or $39 monthly; Pro $79 or $99; Pro+ $239 or $299. Team plans with up to 25 logins start at $159 a month yearly or $199 monthly. Every plan has every feature; only the daily AI budget changes.
Featured owns HARO. On June 2, 2026 it relaunched as an AI co-pilot for PR: a chat that finds journalist requests from HARO, Connectively, Substack, X and LinkedIn, drafts replies, and sends them through your connected Gmail or Outlook. It added podcast search on June 23, 2026 and media monitoring in August 2026. Plans differ only by daily AI usage, and the free plan is pitched at about 2 to 3 media opportunities a week.
Strengths
- HARO queries are included at no extra cost, next to requests from Connectively, Substack, X and LinkedIn
- Sends from your own Gmail or Outlook, with Slack delivery, SSO on Team plans and an MCP server for Claude and Cursor
- Monthly billing on every paid plan, and you cancel online
Weaknesses
- The current product dates from June 2026, so there are few independent reviews: G2 4.9 of 5 from 5 reviews, Trustpilot 3.9 of 5 from 17
- Pricing rests on a daily AI consumption budget the pricing page does not spell out; hitting it pauses AI features until reset
- Sister product Connectively scores 2.5 of 5 on Trustpilot from 8 reviews
Choose Featured if you plan to keep answering HARO queries and want AI drafting and inbox sending around them for $29 to $39 a month.
5. SourceBottle
Visit site- Best for
- Experts and small PR firms in Australia, New Zealand or the UK
- Pricing
- Free forever with a profile and up to 10 keywords. No Pitch, No Pay is $25 per pitch, with staff pitching your profile to up to 3 call-outs a month. Unlimited Pitches is $65 a month or $650 a year; Agency, with 5 expert profiles, is $130 a month or $1,300 a year. The pricing page does not name the currency; an older page quotes prices ex GST, which suggests Australian dollars.
SourceBottle has run media call-outs since 2009, first in Australia and now also the UK, US, New Zealand and Canada. Journalists, bloggers and podcasters post requests, which arrive as alerts matched to your keywords. Unlike HARO, the paid tiers have SourceBottle staff pitch your profile to matching call-outs for you.
Strengths
- A real free tier: respond to unlimited call-outs and keep a directory profile
- Keyword matching cuts noise compared with HARO's category digests
- Strong reach in Australia, New Zealand and the UK; its homepage shows outlets such as the AFR, Sydney Morning Herald and The Guardian
Weaknesses
- Thin US and global volume outside Australia and New Zealand
- Consumer and lifestyle skew; one review notes queries can be about anything, including personal stories, with tight deadlines
- Paid pitching is human-run and capped at 3 pitches a month on the entry plan
Choose SourceBottle if your market is Australia, New Zealand or the UK and you want keyword-filtered requests for free.
6. MentionMatch (formerly Help a B2B Writer)
Visit site- Best for
- B2B and SaaS founders and marketers who want quotes in content from writers at high-authority sites
- Pricing
- No pricing page is published. Superpath said in 2022 it would keep the tool free for writers and keep a free tier for sources, and third-party roundups list it as free. Whether a paid tier exists is not published.
Help a B2B Writer started as Elise Dopson's free board where B2B content writers ask for expert quotes. Superpath bought it on December 8, 2022 and has since renamed it MentionMatch. Sources tick expertise areas such as SaaS, SEO, Sales and AI and only get matching requests by email. Far fewer requests than HARO, and only the ones that match your areas.
Strengths
- B2B-only, so you see marketing, SaaS, sales and SEO requests and nothing else
- Requests often come from high-authority content sites; an older support page cited writers from DR 79 and DR 93 sites
- Free, with no card and no contract
Weaknesses
- Much lower request volume than HARO or Featured
- Superpath's cofounder flagged an AI reply problem on the board in early 2024
- The brand is mid-rename: two domains, a launching soon banner and empty FAQ answers on the live page
Choose MentionMatch (formerly Help a B2B Writer) if you sell to businesses and want a quiet, free feed of B2B content requests.
7. Muck Rack
Visit site- Best for
- PR teams and agencies that want a full journalist database, monitoring and reporting
- Pricing
- Quote only; every plan on the pricing page says contact us. Buyers on Vendr report a median of $13,000 a year (range $8,000 to $20,860), and Reddit reports put one seat at roughly $3,500 to $6,000. Annual contracts, billed in advance, non-refundable and auto-renewing.
Muck Rack is the opposite of HARO. Instead of waiting for a query, you search a journalist and outlet database by beat and recent coverage, build lists, pitch from Gmail or Outlook, and track coverage. For a founder who used HARO to pick up a few quotes a year it is too much; for a small PR firm with several clients it may be the right next step. See our Muck Rack alternatives page for a fuller look.
Strengths
- G2 rates it 4.5 of 5 from 538 reviews; the top themes are ease of use and database quality
- Database, pitching, monitoring and coverage reports in one tool, with podcast monitoring on Standard and Premier
- Sends from Gmail or Outlook with open and click tracking
Weaknesses
- About $5,000 per seat per year to start, on annual contracts that auto-renew
- G2 reviewers tag data inaccuracy and incomplete coverage; Capterra reviewers mention old emails and high bounce rates
- Follow-ups are manual, and a G2 reviewer says outreach is often caught by spam filters
Choose Muck Rack if you run PR for several clients, need a database plus monitoring, and a $5,000-plus annual contract per seat is in budget.
HARO alternatives: common questions
Is HARO still active?
Yes. HARO (Help a Reporter Out) sends up to three emails a day of journalist queries on weekdays and is free for sources and journalists. Cision folded it into the Connectively platform, which added paid plans, in April 2024 and shut that down on December 9, 2024; Featured bought the HARO brand in April 2025 and sent the first HARO emails under its ownership on April 22, 2025. HARO runs at helpareporter.com again.
Who bought HARO?
Featured, the Scottsdale, Arizona company legally named Terkel, Inc., bought HARO from Cision. Cision announced the sale on April 15, 2025 and Featured on April 16; the price was not disclosed. Cision had owned HARO since Vocus, which bought it in June 2010, merged with Cision in 2014. The Connectively brand came with the sale, and in May 2026 Featured moved its own expert Q&A platform onto the Connectively name while keeping HARO as a standalone product.
What replaced HARO?
Connectively replaced it first. Cision told HARO users by email that from April 2, 2024 they could no longer log in at helpareporter.com, and moved them to Connectively, a searchable feed with paid plans at $19, $49 and $149 a month. Cision discontinued Connectively on December 9, 2024, and HARO itself returned under Featured in April 2025. As substitutes, the free ones are Source of Sources (launched April 2024 as HERO), Qwoted's Basic plan and Featured's free plan; PodPitch is the proactive option.
How much does HARO cost?
Nothing. HARO is free for sources and journalists and is supported by newsletter sponsors; Featured's CEO has said there is no paid tier that gets your pitch to a journalist faster. Connectively, the name Featured reused for its own Q&A platform in May 2026, has paid plans: Free (3 answers a month), Lite $19 a month or $11 billed yearly, Pro $49 or $29, and Business $99 or $59, plus pitch credits from $4.99 to $6.99 each.
What are the best free HARO alternatives?
Source of Sources is the closest match: a free daily email of journalist queries in the original HARO format. Qwoted's Basic plan is free but limited to 2 pitches a month with a 2 hour delivery delay. Featured's free plan surfaces about 2 to 3 media opportunities a week. SourceBottle is free for Australian, New Zealand and UK call-outs, and MentionMatch is a free B2B-only board. PodPitch has no free plan.
Is HARO still worth it?
It costs nothing but time, so it is worth a try if you can answer fast and write the reply yourself. Competition is heavy (about 33 pitches per request across Featured's platforms in a Pangram case study), but the same study says journalists select about 1 in 3 human-written pitches against 1 in 10 fully AI-written ones. In its favor, a person reviews every query (about 32% are rejected), and Featured's CEO says journalist requests are up 68% year over year, a vendor figure.
How is PodPitch different from HARO?
HARO is reactive: journalists post requests and you answer. PodPitch is proactive: you pick the podcasts, journalists and Substack writers you want to reach, PodPitch writes each pitch about their recent work, sends it from your Gmail or Outlook, follows up twice and collects the replies in Magic Inbox. It is built for interviews and features rather than quotes with backlinks, and it is a paid tool.
How much does PodPitch cost?
PodPitch does not publish prices; they are quoted on a free demo call. Plans are billed every 3, 6 or 12 months, with longer terms costing less, and every plan includes unlimited users and unlimited client profiles. There is no monthly plan and no free plan.
Which HARO alternative should you choose?
The same daily email format as HARO, free, and strictly moderated. Keep your HARO subscription too; both cost nothing.
The most queries of any platform in the 2025 BuzzStream study, read receipts, and Pro at $99 to $149 a month for 35 pitches.
It owns HARO, includes its queries, drafts replies and sends from your Gmail or Outlook, with a free plan to try first.
Pitches 4 million podcasts, 3 million journalists and Substack writers proactively, each email written about their recent work and sent from your own inbox.
Unlimited users and client profiles, and Booked Media exports for client reports. If monitoring and reporting matter more and the budget is there, Muck Rack.
A free, B2B-only request board with writers from high-authority content sites, sending only requests that match your expertise areas.
Want to see who PodPitch would pitch for you?
A rep will run a live search for your topic, show you the shows and writers that fit, and walk you through pricing.
Sources
- HARO about page (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- HARO blog: Help a Reporter Out (HARO) is back (Apr 2025)
- HARO blog: Connectively is back and HARO isn't going anywhere (May 26, 2026)
- HARO blog: We ban a HARO account every 23 minutes
- Cision announces sale of HARO to Featured.com (PR Newswire, Apr 15, 2025)
- Featured.com acquires HARO from Cision (PR Newswire, Apr 16, 2025)
- Cision: Connectively has been discontinued (Dec 2024)
- Frank Strong, Farewell to Help a Reporter Out (quotes Cision's email on the Apr 2, 2024 switch)
- Wikipedia: Help a Reporter Out
- Featured research: HARO statistics
- Pangram case study on Featured (pitch and request counts)
- Aly Walansky interview with Featured's CEO (Substack)
- HARO reviews on TrustRadius
- r/PublicRelations thread on HARO, Qwoted and Featured response rates
- Connectively pricing page (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- Connectively reviews on Trustpilot
- Featured launches the AI co-pilot for PR (PR Newswire, Jun 2026)
- Featured about page
- Featured pricing page (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- Featured terms of service
- Featured reviews on G2
- Featured reviews on Trustpilot
- Source of Sources homepage (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- Muck Rack partnership with HERO (May 8, 2024)
- CommPRO: Peter Shankman launches HERO (Apr 2024)
- Prezly: the best HARO alternatives
- Answer Socrates: HARO alternatives
- Qwoted pricing page (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- Qwoted in-app plans page (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- Qwoted for PR and marketing pros
- Qwoted community guidelines
- Qwoted terms of service
- Qwoted reviews on G2
- Qwoted reviews on Trustpilot
- BuzzStream and PressPulse journalist request platform study (2025)
- SourceBottle pricing page (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- SourceBottle homepage
- SourceBottle subscription page (older)
- Medialyst: SourceBottle alternatives
- Pearl Lemon PR: SourceBottle review
- Superpath has acquired Help a B2B Writer (Dec 2022)
- MentionMatch homepage (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- Help a B2B Writer support page (older)
- Phillip Stemann: HARO alternatives
- Medialyst: Featured alternatives
- Jimmy Daly (Superpath) on the AI problem on Help a B2B Writer (LinkedIn)
- Muck Rack pricing page (checked Oct 21, 2026)
- Muck Rack on Vendr
- Rephonic: Muck Rack pricing (Reddit-sourced)
- Muck Rack terms
- Muck Rack reviews on G2
- Muck Rack reviews on Capterra
- Muck Rack help: pitch follow-ups
- PodPitch reviews on G2 (checked Oct 21, 2026)